Despite years of pseudoscientific psychobabble, mainstream psychological
researchers have determined that there is no such thing as a "rescue
personality".
The "rescue personality" was described by CISM/CISD founder Jeff Mitchell,
PhD. His model postulated that EMS providers and fire department personnel were
different from the rest of the population and hence the need for CISM/CISD.
Mitchell described the "rescue personality" in an issue of JEMS and Fire
Engineering. However, when mainstream researchers asked to see his data--it was
somehow lost in an office move and could never be found. In the current issue
of The Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma studies Canadian
psychologist Shannon Wagner studied the concept for a "rescue personality" and
found no evidence it exists.
She wrote, "Mitchell and Bray (1990) describe emergency response workers as
inner-directed, action oriented, obsessed with high standards of performance,
traditional, socially conservative, easily bored, and highly dedicated. In
addition, these authors describe emergency workers as people who like control,
both of the situation and themselves, and enjoy being needed. Further, Mitchell
(1988) suggests that in order to effectively implement CISD, a mental health
professional must be aware of "the unique personalities of emergency personnel
and the special jobs they perform" (p. 43).
Currently, the evidence of benefit, or lack thereof, for the CISD has been
the source of much debate (e.g., McNally, Bryant, & Ehlers, 2003; Jacobs,
2004). Although the efficacy of the CISD is not the focus of the current
discussion, the efficacy debate is nonetheless contingent on the issue of the
so-called rescue personality and its consequent existence. If the rescue
personality is not a definable and evident aspect of those who choose to
participate in the emergency response services, one of the primary principles
that comprise the foundation for the CISD will be abandoned." She concluded, "
The existence of a rescue personality is a fundamental tenet for a very
controversial method of intervention. Given this personality type's important
role within the field of emergency service mental health, it is a serious
detriment to researchers, practitioners, and emergency response service workers
alike, that the question of its existence has not been adequately addressed. The
potential effectiveness of the CISD with fire, emergency medical, and police
service workers is theoretically dependent on these individuals being a
homogenous, but independent, group. Specifically, within the emergency services
this homogeneity is, in part, assumed to be reflected in the rescue personality,
a personality that is purported to characterize the type of individual who
chooses to perform rescue-related work. Currently, there is little evidence for
a distinct personality type that is reflective of emergency service workers as a
whole."
The only people believing in the CISM/CISD pablum are those who fail to
recognize the overwhelming science and it will only take litigation and
some check writing to get them to stop.
For the full article:
http://www.massey.ac.nz/~trauma/issues/2005-2/wagner.htm