premier site for EMS responders,  instructors and students 
~ all with a dash of fun~

EMS House  of DeFrance

the human face of EMS cyberspace


A mind once stretched by a new idea never regains its original dimensions

 

Email this article  | Printer friendly page    

  Studies Trials Abstracts


 New CPR promises better results by compressing abdomen, not chest
by

A biomedical engineer at Purdue University has developed a new method to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation that promises to be more effective than standard CPR because it increases nourishing blood flow through the heart by 25 percent over the current method.

A new technique is desperately needed because conventional CPR has a success rate of 5 percent to 10 percent, depending on how fast rescuers are able to respond and how well the procedure is performed. For every one minute of delay, the resuscitation rate decreases by 10 percent.

"In other words, at 10 minutes, the resuscitation is absolutely ineffective," said Leslie Geddes, Showalter Distinguished Professor Emeritus in Purdue's Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. "Any medical procedure that had that low a success rate would be abandoned right away. But the alternative is not very good, either: Don't do CPR and the person is going to die."

Geddes has developed the first new CPR alternative, called "only rhythmic abdominal compression," or OAC-CPR, which works by pushing on the abdomen instead of the chest.

"There are major problems with standard CPR," Geddes said. "One is the risk of breaking ribs if you push too hard, but if you don't push hard you won't save the person. Another problem is the risk of transferring infection with mouth-to-mouth breathing."

The new CPR method eliminates both risks, Geddes said.

Findings will be detailed in a research paper appearing this month in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine, published by Elsevier Inc. The paper was authored by Geddes and his Purdue colleagues Ann E. Rundell, assistant professor of biomedical engineering, biomedical engineering doctoral student Aaron Lottes, and basic medical sciences graduate students Andre Kemeny and Michael Otlewski.

In standard chest-compression CPR, which has been in practice since the 1960s, the rescuer pushes on the chest and blows into the subject's mouth twice for every 30 chest compressions. However, the risk of infection is so grave that many doctors and nurses often refuse to administer mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. In one 1993 study of 433 doctors and 152 nurses, 45 percent of doctors and 80 percent of nurses said they would refuse to administer mouth-to-mouth resuscitation on a stranger.

"This is the real world that nobody knows about, and it's a sobering thought," Geddes said.

OAC-CPR eliminates the need to perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

The American Heart Association requires that rescuers administering CPR push with enough force to depress the chest 1 and a half to 2 inches at a rate of 100 times per minute.

"To depress the chest 1.5 to 2 inches takes 100 to 125 pounds of force," Geddes said. "So you have to push pretty hard and pretty fast, and two people are needed to perform it properly. One blows up the lungs and the other compresses the chest. And when the one who's compressing the chest gets tired, they change positions."

OAC-CPR requires only one rescuer.

Instead of two breaths for every 30 chest compressions, the new procedure provides a breath for every abdominal compression because pushing on the abdomen depresses the diaphragm toward the head, expelling air from the lungs. The release of force causes inhalation.

Researchers have known since the 1980s that pushing on the abdomen circulates blood through the heart. The idea was originated by Purdue nursing doctoral student Sandra Ralston, Geddes said.

"She made the remarkable observation that if you pushed on the abdomen after each chest compression you could double the CPR blood flow," he said. "So I started thinking, what would happen if you just pushed on the abdomen and eliminated chest compression entirely?"

The procedure provides a new way to effectively perform "coronary perfusion," or pumping blood through the heart muscle, which is critical for successful resuscitation because the heart muscle is nourished by oxygenated blood, Geddes said.

"Unfortunately, in standard chest-compression CPR, blood sometimes flows in the wrong direction, which means the coronary blood flow goes backward, bringing de-oxygenated blood back into the heart muscle," Geddes said. "This retrograde flow reduces the likelihood of resuscitation."

Findings showed that OAC-CPR eliminates this backward flow.

The Purdue researchers compared coronary artery blood flow during standard chest-compression CPR with the flow resulting from only abdominal compression CPR. Findings showed that using the new method and pushing with the same force recommended for standard CPR provided 25 percent more blood flow through the heart muscle without retrograde flow in the coronary arteries.

The researchers followed the standard recommended by the American Heart Association, pushing with 100 pounds of pressure 100 times per minute.

"With OAC-CPR, you really don't have to press as hard or as often, but we followed the American Heart Association standard to avoid possible criticism from people who could have said we didn't observe the standard," Geddes said.

Another benefit of OAC-CPR is that it eliminates rib fractures, which are commonly caused by compressing the chest. Rib fractures cause the chest to recoil more slowly, but effective CPR requires that rescuers wait until the chest recoils fully before compressing.

Geddes created a wooden "pressure applicator" that resembles a scaled-down version of a baseball home plate. It is contoured so that it can be used to compress the abdomen without pushing on the ribs. However, a rescuer could push with the hands to perform the procedure if no applicator were available.

Abdominal organs contain about 25 percent of the total blood volume in the body.

"You can squeeze all of that into the central circulation when you press on the abdomen," Geddes said.

Whether the procedure gains widespread acceptance depends on whether other researchers can duplicate the results.

"In research, you publish data and then the scientific community looks at the data and tries to duplicate it to verify that it works," said Geddes, who was awarded the National Medal of Technology from President George W. Bush in a White House ceremony on July 27. It is the nation's highest honor for technological innovation.

Leslie Geddes, the Showalter Distinguished Professor Emeritus in Purdue's Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, demonstrates a new technique for performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The method promises to be more effective than standard CPR because it increases nourishing blood flow through the heart by 25 percent. Geddes has developed the new method, called "only rhythmic abdominal compression," or OAC-CPR, which works by pushing on the abdomen instead of the chest. (Purdue News Service photo/ David Umberger)

The research was funded by the Purdue Trask Fund.

Elsevier is a global business headquartered in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and has offices worldwide. Elsevier is part of Reed Elsevier Group plc (http://www.reedelsevier.com/), a world-leading publisher and information provider. Operating in the science and medical, legal, education and business-to-business sectors, Reed Elsevier provides high-quality and flexible information solutions to users, with increasing emphasis on the Internet as a means of delivery.

Writer: Emil Venere, (765) 494-4709, venere@purdue.edu

Source: Leslie Geddes, (765) 494-2997, geddes@ecn.purdue.edu

Purdue News Service: (765) 494-2096; https://cms.itap.purdue.edu/servlet/$326

 

 

Sep 30, 2007
source/photo courtesy of



Top of Page

THE EMS STORE
sales support this site
Latest in  Studies Trials Abstracts
more > see category page bottom
Accuracy of EMS-Recorded Patient Demographic Data
Researchers have found evidence of age discrimination on the part of emergency medical personnel
Heart Drug Used in Ambulance Boosts Survival
Professor’s article will be published internationally, “EMS Call Volume Predictions: A Comparative Study”
EMS Systems Fail to Adopt Prehospital ECGs for Heart Attack Patients, Says Report
Report: Feds Ignored Blood-Substitute Dangers
New 3-D ultrasound could improve stroke diagnosis, care
Ambulance clinical placements - a pilot study of students' experience
Viper Venom Tested on Stroke Victims
CPR, calling 911 worked as well as using an at-home defibrillator
Study: Obesity surgery can cure diabetes
New England Journal of Medicine: Even in Hospitals, Shock Treatment Delayed for Cardiac Arrest
Engaging rural communities in health care through a paramedic expanded scope of practice
Study says artificial blood may carry risks
Study: Arrival time affects heart-attack care
Hot Sauce: The next "must have" to carry on your ambulance?
ANP Limits Damage to Heart Muscle Following Heart Attack
Paramedic Practitioners: Paramedics can provide an effective alternative to standard ambulance service
How much pre-shock CPR is needed to save lives
US emergency services ill-prepared to help kids: study
New CPR promises better results by compressing abdomen, not chest
The Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Fire Fighters and EMS Responders
Study questions school defibrillators
Air Force funds research on self-healing materials
Paramedic Treatment of Breathing Trouble Saves Lives
for additional items, see the page bottom of each category

AK Fun and Ninja EMT shirts at the EMS Store
Personalized orders accepted,
send  to a friend- gift card included.



Baseball Jersey
Blue, Black or Red

The contents of this site, unless otherwise specified, are copyright by © EMS House of DeFrance.

Disclaimer: The information presented herein is not necessarily endorsed by the EMS House of DeFrance or any of its branches or sub sites. Users are reminded to consult with local controls before adopting procedures described in any information presented on this site, or any of its branches or sub sites. 

© EMS House of DeFrance. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or commercial use of these materials prohibited without prior written consent of the EMS House of  DeFrance and/or the author. The name EMS House of  DeFrance and associated EMS House of  DeFrance logo(s) are trademarks of EMS House of  DeFrance. Contact:
defrance@defrance.org