premier site for EMS responders,  instructors and students 
~ all with a dash of fun~

EMS House  of DeFrance

the human face of EMS cyberspace


A mind once stretched by a new idea never regains its original dimensions

 

Email this article  | Printer friendly page    

  Studies Trials Abstracts


 Paramedic Practitioners: Paramedics can provide an effective alternative to standard ambulance service
by

Paramedics with extended skills can provide a safe and effective alternative to standard ambulance transfer and hospital treatment for older people with a minor injury or illness, finds a study published on bmj.com today.

Older people make up to 21% of visits to hospital emergency departments and previous studies have suggested that paramedics can be trained to manage certain conditions in the community. But current research evidence concerning safety, effectiveness and costs to support these changes in practice is lacking.

So researchers based in South Yorkshire carried out the first randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an alternative approach to managing older people with minor problems.

They selected seven experienced paramedics who had completed the Paramedic Practitioner in Older People’s Support (PPOPS) training course. This scheme aims to deliver patient centred care to older people calling the emergency services with conditions judged to be not immediately life threatening.

The trial took place in Sheffield from September 2003 to September 2004 and included 3,018 patients aged 60 years and above calling the emergency services between 0800-2000hrs with a complaint that fell within the scope of practice of the paramedic practitioners. These included falls, lacerations, nosebleeds or minor burns.

During each week, a paramedic practitioner based in the ambulance control room identified eligible calls and notified either a paramedic practitioner in the community (intervention weeks) or in the emergency department for the standard 999 service (control weeks).

Emergency department attendance or hospital admission between 0 and 28 days was recorded, as was interval from time of call to time of discharge. Patient satisfaction with the service they had received was also measured using a postal questionnaire 3 and 28 days after the incident.

Patients in the intervention group were almost 25% less likely to attend the emergency department or require hospital admission within 28 days. These patients also experienced a shorter total episode time by around 42 minutes.

Patients in the intervention group were also more likely to report being highly satisfied with their health care episode than those in the control group.

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of health outcomes and mortality 28 days after their initial episode.

Despite some study limitations, the authors conclude that this service conveyed significant benefits for patients and the NHS in terms of reduced overall emergency department and hospital attendances, shorter episode times and higher levels of patient satisfaction. The new service also appears to be safe in that they identified no difference in mortality or health outcomes after 28 days.

As pressure increases within the NHS to extend this type of approach, this trial will help to inform practice in this fast developing area, they add.

This trial shows that high quality study designs are feasible in this setting, says an accompanying editorial. Such trials should, therefore, be used to evaluate the more widespread emergency care practitioners scheme and other extended scope paramedic programmes before further costly expansions take place.

 

 

Oct 5, 2007
source/photo courtesy of



Top of Page

THE EMS STORE
sales support this site
Latest in  Studies Trials Abstracts
more > see category page bottom
Accuracy of EMS-Recorded Patient Demographic Data
Researchers have found evidence of age discrimination on the part of emergency medical personnel
Heart Drug Used in Ambulance Boosts Survival
Professor’s article will be published internationally, “EMS Call Volume Predictions: A Comparative Study”
EMS Systems Fail to Adopt Prehospital ECGs for Heart Attack Patients, Says Report
Report: Feds Ignored Blood-Substitute Dangers
New 3-D ultrasound could improve stroke diagnosis, care
Ambulance clinical placements - a pilot study of students' experience
Viper Venom Tested on Stroke Victims
CPR, calling 911 worked as well as using an at-home defibrillator
Study: Obesity surgery can cure diabetes
New England Journal of Medicine: Even in Hospitals, Shock Treatment Delayed for Cardiac Arrest
Engaging rural communities in health care through a paramedic expanded scope of practice
Study says artificial blood may carry risks
Study: Arrival time affects heart-attack care
Hot Sauce: The next "must have" to carry on your ambulance?
ANP Limits Damage to Heart Muscle Following Heart Attack
Paramedic Practitioners: Paramedics can provide an effective alternative to standard ambulance service
How much pre-shock CPR is needed to save lives
US emergency services ill-prepared to help kids: study
New CPR promises better results by compressing abdomen, not chest
The Effects of Sleep Deprivation on Fire Fighters and EMS Responders
Study questions school defibrillators
Air Force funds research on self-healing materials
Paramedic Treatment of Breathing Trouble Saves Lives
for additional items, see the page bottom of each category

AK Fun and Ninja EMT shirts at the EMS Store
Personalized orders accepted,
send  to a friend- gift card included.



Baseball Jersey
Blue, Black or Red

The contents of this site, unless otherwise specified, are copyright by © EMS House of DeFrance.

Disclaimer: The information presented herein is not necessarily endorsed by the EMS House of DeFrance or any of its branches or sub sites. Users are reminded to consult with local controls before adopting procedures described in any information presented on this site, or any of its branches or sub sites. 

© EMS House of DeFrance. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or commercial use of these materials prohibited without prior written consent of the EMS House of  DeFrance and/or the author. The name EMS House of  DeFrance and associated EMS House of  DeFrance logo(s) are trademarks of EMS House of  DeFrance. Contact:
defrance@defrance.org