premier site for EMS responders,  instructors and students 
~ all with a dash of fun~

EMS House  of DeFrance

the human face of EMS cyberspace


A mind once stretched by a new idea never regains its original dimensions

 

Email this article  | Printer friendly page    

  Studies Trials Abstracts


 NHLBI halts concentrated saline solution for shock trial
by

The NHLBI Halts Study of Concentrated Saline for Patients with Shock Due to Lack of Survival Benefit


The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health has stopped a clinical trial studying the benefits and safety of administering a highly concentrated form of saline solution in the ambulance (before hospital arrival) to trauma patients suffering from shock due to severe bleeding. The trial was stopped because patients who received the concentrated saline solutions were no more likely to survive than those who received a normal saline solution. A parallel study of concentrated saline for traumatic brain injury without shock continues.

Typically, in the crucial early minutes before blood transfusions can be safely administered in the hospital, trauma patients receive normal saline solution intravenously in the field to compensate for blood loss and buy time. Concentrated saline solution is believed to compensate for blood loss more effectively, lessen excessive inflammatory responses, and prevent brain swelling.

The trials of concentrated saline solutions are conducted through a network of clinical research sites in the United States and Canada called the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC). A major focus of the ROC is to conduct randomized trials of promising new treatments for severe traumatic injury in real-world settings.

“Survival from traumatic injury is a critical public health issue and the large clinical trials under way in this effort are needed to improve the treatment of patients. Of course, it is always disappointing when new therapies, such as concentrated saline for shock, fail to offer added benefit to patients. However, we look forward to results from the other ongoing studies that are part of this important research consortium,” said Elizabeth G. Nabel, M.D., director of the NHLBI, the lead federal sponsor of the research effort.

The NHLBI suspended enrollment into the concentrated saline (hypertonic) shock study on Aug. 25, 2008, due to concerns raised by ROC’s Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), an independent group monitoring the study. In the shock trial, the DSMB observed no difference among the treatment groups in 28-day mortality. However, more of the patients receiving hypertonic saline died before reaching the hospital or in the emergency department, while more of the patients receiving normal saline died during the remainder of the 28-day follow-up period.

The DSMB requested further analysis of these observations. The additional analysis looked at in-hospital data (following saline administration in the field) from 545 patients in the largest enrolling hospital from each site. The results, presented to the DSMB on Feb. 25, 2009, confirmed the previous findings that deaths occurred earlier in patients who received hypertonic saline and that there was no significant difference in cumulative mortality between the hypertonic and normal saline groups at 28 days. However, the new analysis did not fully explain the mortality findings. The investigators are completing analyses of these results and will submit them for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Although there were no similar concerns about earlier mortality in the traumatic brain injury trial, this trial was also temporarily and voluntarily suspended last August so that emergency medical service (EMS) personnel could be retrained to enroll only brain injury patients, not those who would have been eligible for the shock study. The traumatic brain injury study resumed in late November 2008.

ROC is a research network of nine major regional clinical centers in the United States and Canada focusing on treating patients who collapse with cardiac arrest or with life-threatening traumatic injury before they reach the hospital. Under the various research protocols, participating EMS providers give standard emergency care to all patients, with some patients eligible to receive the experimental treatment in addition to usual care. The clinical trials are conducted under strict FDA and well defined Canadian guidelines that allow for patients in life-threatening situations to participate in research under an exception to informed consent, according to U.S. and Canadian law.

In both the shock and traumatic brain injury ROC hypertonic saline trials, patients were randomly selected to receive either approximately 8 ounces of intravenous normal saline, which has nearly the same concentration of salt as blood and is considered standard care; approximately 8 ounces of hypertonic saline, which has a higher salt concentration; or about 8 ounces of hypertonic saline with dextran, a carbohydrate which can prolong the effect of the hypertonic saline. The stopped trauma shock study tested whether hypertonic solutions improve survival by 28 days after injury, compared to usual care with normal saline.

The now-resumed trial of brain- injured patients continues to investigate whether the hypertonic solutions improve both survival and brain function in patients 6 months after traumatic injury. As the traumatic brain injury study continues, ROC investigators hope that hypertonic saline will prove beneficial for this application. "Patients with traumatic brain injury have significant swelling of the brain, and hypertonic fluids are known to be very effective at reducing this swelling, which may improve recovery," said Eileen Bulger, M.D., the University of Washington, Seattle, and co-principal investigator of the hypertonic saline studies.

"Hypertonic saline has also been shown to improve blood flow to the brain after injury and to protect nerve cells from increased intracranial pressure," added David Hoyt, M.D., University of California, Irvine, the other co-principal investigator of the hypertonic saline studies.

The NHLBI is the lead sponsor of the ROC studies with additional funding provided by the NIH’s National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the Institute of Circulatory and Respiratory Health of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, U.S. Army Medical Research & Materiel Command, American Heart Association, Defence Research and Development Canada, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

For additional information about ROC, see: https://roc.uwctc.org/tiki/tiki-index.php. To interview an NHLBI spokesperson, contact the NHLBI Communications Office at 301-496-4236 or at nhlbi_news@nhlbi.nih.gov. To interview Dr. Bulger, contact Susan Gregg-Hanson at 206-616-6730; to interview Dr. Hoyt, contact John Murray /Tom Vasich at 714-456-7759.

Part of the National Institutes of Health, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) plans, conducts, and supports research related to the causes, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of heart, blood vessel, lung, and blood diseases; and sleep disorders. The Institute also administers national health education campaigns on women and heart disease, healthy weight for children, and other topics. NHLBI press releases and other materials are available online at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) — The Nation's Medical Research Agency — includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It is the primary federal agency for conducting and supporting basic, clinical and translational medical research, and it investigates the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit http://www.nih.gov/.

 

 

Mar 31, 2009
source/photo courtesy of



Top of Page

THE EMS STORE
sales support this site
Latest in  Studies Trials Abstracts
more > see category page bottom
Study: Transfer of heart attack patients too slow
Dept. of Homeland Security Ambulance Safety Design Survey
Blood type linked to stroke risks, says report delivered at AHA meeting
Defibrillator 'upgrade' apparently a dud
Studies: Stem cells reverse heart damage
Bedside test finds awareness in vegetative brains
Gentler heart restarter shows promise
Interventions Fail to Improve Cardiac Arrest Outcomes
Heart-Attack Patients Take Slow Road to Treatment
Chest pain severity not a heart attack indicator
Faster stroke care when patients come by ambulance
Keep pumping while charging
Ambulance Diversion Strongly Linked with Increased Mortality of Heart Attack Patients, New Study Finds
Study: Helicopters might inhibit health care
Heart attack patients need to get to the hospital sooner
Study: Alcohol more lethal than heroin, cocaine
Simple Arm Cuff Limits Heart Damage in STEMI Patients
Sex hormone trial for head injury
New England Journal of Medicine Study Finds Cognition in Vegetative Patients
'Hibernation' research could help on battlefield, at home
Study: Some people do exhibit 'werewolf' tendencies during a full moon.
NHLBI Stops Enrollment in Study on Resuscitation Methods for Cardiac Arrest
Paramedic assessment of pain in the cognitively impaired adult patient
Gel hope for brain injury repair
Paramedics Cannot Determine Which Patients Require Transport
for additional items, see the page bottom of each category

AK Fun and Ninja EMT shirts at the EMS Store
Personalized orders accepted,
send  to a friend- gift card included.



Baseball Jersey
Blue, Black or Red

The contents of this site, unless otherwise specified, are copyright by © EMS House of DeFrance.

Disclaimer: The information presented herein is not necessarily endorsed by the EMS House of DeFrance or any of its branches or sub sites. Users are reminded to consult with local controls before adopting procedures described in any information presented on this site, or any of its branches or sub sites. 

© EMS House of DeFrance. All Rights Reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or commercial use of these materials prohibited without prior written consent of the EMS House of  DeFrance and/or the author. The name EMS House of  DeFrance and associated EMS House of  DeFrance logo(s) are trademarks of EMS House of  DeFrance. Contact:
defrance@defrance.org