EMS crews have some pretty high tech gadgets in their rigs when they’re
responding to accident calls. They must check screens, handle radio calls,
converse on mobile phones and monitor dashboard computers that link to
hospitals. This puts EMS crews at increased risk for accidents, especially since
they are moving in and out of traffic at high speeds while checking their on
board equipment.
Witness a New York case where a paramedic quickly checked his dashboard
computer while on the way to the hospital and when he looked back, just missed
slamming into a pedestrian in the street. Another paramedic hit a flatbed truck;
the accident paralyzed his partner. What caused the accident? the driver glanced
at his GPS screen.
Statistics from the FARS reporting system indicate that ambulances get
involved in fatal crashes far more than we may think. For example from 1991 to
2000 there were 300 fatal crashes where 82 ambulance occupants died and 275
passengers in other vehicles and pedestrians were killed. While police, EMS, and
ambulance crews have the latest in technology for good reason, who polices the
police and EMS crews?
It is difficult to argue that police and EMS crews shouldn’t have
technology at their fingertips; this technology may save lives. However, the
Health and Safety Institute says that first responders are not provided with
enough training to deal with all the distractions. Perhaps additional and
superior training will help, so may voice activated technology. Times are tough,
however, and expense will be a consideration in providing less distracting
technology and more training.
Unfortunately, I don't have the answer; I do have an opinion. Ambulance and
EMS drivers, police officers and firefighters are held to the same standards of
safety the we citizens are. While these emergency vehicles can avoid certain
traffic laws to get to and from an emergency, they must do so as safely as
humanly possible. In those areas where the public safety is at issue, no expense
should be spared to make our citizens safe. If research shows that more training
is appropriate, then more training should be provided, regardless of the
expense. If research supports the purchase of voice activated technology, then
money should not be a determining factor in the decision to do what makes our
citizens safe. Eliminating unnecessary and unsafe distractions are certainly one
way to keep us safe and keep emergency vehicles out of serious accidents. That's
Lawsuit Financial's opinion, what
do you think?
Mark Bello has thirty-three years experience as a trial lawyer and twelve
years as an underwriter and situational analyst in the lawsuit
funding industry. He is the owner and founder of Lawsuit
Financial Corporation which helps provide cash flow solutions and
consulting when necessities of life funding is needed during litigation. Bello
is a Justice Pac member of the American Association for Justice, Sustaining and
Justice Pac member of the Michigan Association for Justice, Business Associate
of the Florida, Tennessee, and Colorado Associations for Justice, a member of
the American Bar Association, the State Bar of Michigan and the Injury Board.